The Level of Understanding of Pedagogical Competence of Physical Education, Health and Recreation Students of Sports Science Faculty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2021.4.04Keywords:
level of understanding, pedagogical competence, physical education, health and recreation studentsAbstract
The study purpose. This study aims to determine the level of understanding of the pedagogical competence ofPhysical Education, Health and Recreation students of the Faculty of Sports Science, Yogyakarta State University, batch 2016.
Materials and methods. This research method is a survey with a quantitative descriptive approach. The population is 180 physical education students, the sample selection is 52 physical education students using incidental sampling technique. The research instrument is a valid and reliable questionnaire. The data analysis technique is the analysis presented using the percentage.
Results. The results obtained show that the level of understanding of the pedagogic competence of Physical Education, Health and Recreation students of the Faculty of Sports Science, Yogyakarta State University, class 2016 was “very low” 3.85% (2 students), “low” 67.31% (35 students), “medium” 19.23% (10 students), “high” 9.62% (5 students) and “very high” 0% (0 students).
Conclusions. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the level of understanding of the pedagogic competence of Physical Education students is in the low category.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Gaetano, R. (2012). Motor learning and didactics into physical education and sport documents in middle school-first cycle of education in Italy. Journal of physical education and sport, 12(2), 157.
Yusnita, Y., Eriyanti, F., Engkizar, E., Anwar, F., Putri, N. E., Arifin, Z., & Syafril, S. (2018). The Effect of Professional Education and Training for Teachers (PLPG) in Improving Pedagogic Competence and Teacher Performance. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 3(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v3i2.2701
Azhary, L., Handoyo, E., & Khafid, M. (2018). The Implementation of Integrated Character Education in Policy Design at SD Muhammadiyah (Plus) Salatiga. Journal of Primary Education, 7(2), 172-178.
Asari, S., Fauziyah, N., & Uchtiawati, S. (2018). Improving Teacher Pedagogic Competences in Remote Areas through Lesson Study Activity. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.2p.53
Ahmad, A., & Setyaningsih, E. (2012). Teacher Professionalism: A Study on Teachers’ Professional and Pedagogic Competence at Junior, Senior, and Vocational High Schools in Banyumas Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. Sosiohumanika, 5(1).
Liakopoulou, M. (2011). Teachers’ Pedagogical Competence as a Prerequisite for Entering the Profession: European Journal of Education, Part I. European Journal of Education, 46(4), 474-488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2011.01495.x
Beyer, L. E. (2002). The Politics of Standards and the Education of Teachers. Teaching Education, 13(3), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047621022000023280
Oser, F. K., Achtenhagen, F., & Renold, U. (2006). Competence Oriented Teacher Training: Old Research Demands and New Pathways. BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087903374
Atmowardoyo, H. (2018). Research Methods in TEFL Studies: Descriptive Research, Case Study, Error Analysis, and R & D. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(1), 197. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0901.25
Ward, J. K., Comer, U., & Stone, S. (2018). On Qualifying Qualitative Research: Emerging Perspectives and the “Deer” (Descriptive, Exploratory, Evolutionary, Repeat) Paradigm. Interchange, 49(1), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-018-9313-x
Assarroudi, A., Heshmati Nabavi, F., Armat, M. R., Ebadi, A., & Vaismoradi, M. (2018). Directed qualitative content analysis: The description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. Journal of Research in Nursing, 23(1), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987117741667
Deeks, J. J., Higgins, J. P., Altman, D. G., & on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. (2019). Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604.ch10
Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2017). Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315650982
Höglinger, M., & Diekmann, A. (2017). Uncovering a Blind Spot in Sensitive Question Research: False Positives Undermine the Crosswise-Model RRT. Political Analysis, 25(1), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2016.5
Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Amin, A. M., Corebima, A. D., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2020). The Correlation between Metacognitive Skills and Critical Thinking Skills at the Implementation of Four Different Learning Strategies in Animal Physiology Lectures. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 143-163.
Hashim, H. (2018). Application of technology in the digital era education. International Journal of Research in Counseling and Education, 2(1), 1-5.
Arikunto, Suharsimi (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Yusnita, Y., Eriyanti, F., Engkizar, E., Anwar, F., Putri, N. E., Arifin, Z., & Syafril, S. (2018). The Effect of Professional Education and Training for Teachers (PLPG) in Improving Pedagogic Competence and Teacher Performance. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 3(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v3i2.2701
Azhary, L., Handoyo, E., & Khafid, M. (2018). The Implementation of Integrated Character Education in Policy Design at SD Muhammadiyah (Plus) Salatiga. Journal of Primary Education, 7(2), 172-178.
Asari, S., Fauziyah, N., & Uchtiawati, S. (2018). Improving Teacher Pedagogic Competences in Remote Areas through Lesson Study Activity. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.2p.53
Ahmad, A., & Setyaningsih, E. (2012). Teacher Professionalism: A Study on Teachers’ Professional and Pedagogic Competence at Junior, Senior, and Vocational High Schools in Banyumas Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. Sosiohumanika, 5(1).
Liakopoulou, M. (2011). Teachers’ Pedagogical Competence as a Prerequisite for Entering the Profession: European Journal of Education, Part I. European Journal of Education, 46(4), 474-488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2011.01495.x
Beyer, L. E. (2002). The Politics of Standards and the Education of Teachers. Teaching Education, 13(3), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047621022000023280
Oser, F. K., Achtenhagen, F., & Renold, U. (2006). Competence Oriented Teacher Training: Old Research Demands and New Pathways. BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087903374
Atmowardoyo, H. (2018). Research Methods in TEFL Studies: Descriptive Research, Case Study, Error Analysis, and R & D. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(1), 197. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0901.25
Ward, J. K., Comer, U., & Stone, S. (2018). On Qualifying Qualitative Research: Emerging Perspectives and the “Deer” (Descriptive, Exploratory, Evolutionary, Repeat) Paradigm. Interchange, 49(1), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-018-9313-x
Assarroudi, A., Heshmati Nabavi, F., Armat, M. R., Ebadi, A., & Vaismoradi, M. (2018). Directed qualitative content analysis: The description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. Journal of Research in Nursing, 23(1), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987117741667
Deeks, J. J., Higgins, J. P., Altman, D. G., & on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. (2019). Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604.ch10
Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2017). Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315650982
Höglinger, M., & Diekmann, A. (2017). Uncovering a Blind Spot in Sensitive Question Research: False Positives Undermine the Crosswise-Model RRT. Political Analysis, 25(1), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2016.5
Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Amin, A. M., Corebima, A. D., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2020). The Correlation between Metacognitive Skills and Critical Thinking Skills at the Implementation of Four Different Learning Strategies in Animal Physiology Lectures. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 143-163.
Hashim, H. (2018). Application of technology in the digital era education. International Journal of Research in Counseling and Education, 2(1), 1-5.
Arikunto, Suharsimi (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Downloads
Published
2021-12-25
How to Cite
Hastuti, T. A., Jatmika, H. M., Pratama, K. W., & Yudhistira, D. (2021). The Level of Understanding of Pedagogical Competence of Physical Education, Health and Recreation Students of Sports Science Faculty. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 21(4), 310–316. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2021.4.04
Issue
Section
Original Scientific Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
