Peculiarities of Higher Education Students’ Functional and Motor Preparedness

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2017.4.1201

Keywords:

male students, functional state, motor abilities

Abstract

The objective is to determine the age peculiarities of higher education students’ functional and motor preparedness.

Materials and methods. The participants in the study were male students of the 1st year (n = 98), 2nd year (n = 69), 3rd year (n = 56), 4th year (n = 32), and 5th year (n = 46) of training.

The following research methods were used to solve the tasks set within the study: analysis of scientific literature, pedagogical observation, pedagogical testing; the index method and biomedical methods. The pedagogical methods were used to study the peculiarities of the functional state of the organism and the motor abilities in higher education students of the 1st-5th years of trtaining; methods of mathematical statistics were used to processing the data.

Results. The first and second-year students demonstrated statistically reliable dynamics in the indicators of their functional and motor preparedness. Thus, at the age of 19, the students show a decrease in the Ruffier index (9.7 – “good heart”), the static equilibrium (12 sec. – “satisfactory”), and the standing long jump (Р <0.05). The breath-holding indicators and the speed-strength abilities (running 100 m) and the strength of hand muscles remain unchanged. At the age of 20, the students show a significant deterioration in the results of Gench’s test (31 sec.) and Romberg’s test (3.9 sec.), (P <0.05). The recorded results of the Ruffie index, timed inspiratory capacity, speed-strength abilities, and strength demonstrated no change. At the age of  20-21, significant changes happen to the indicators of the cardiovascular system and breath-holding. The speed-strength abilities, the strength of hand muscles remain unchanged. At the age of  21-22 (4th and 5th year), all the indicators show no change.

Conclusions. At the age ranging between 18 and 22, the Ruffle index shows an increase in the number of students whose diovascular system state indicator is assessed as “good” and a decrease in the number of students whose result by this indicator is assessed as “bad”. The level of motor abilities development varies statistically unreliably.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashmarin, Yu. V. (1990).Teoriya i metodika fizicheskogo vospitaniya. M.: Prosveshchenie, 287.

Balsevich, V.K. & Zaporozhanov, V.A. (1987). Fizicheskaya aktivnost cheloveka. K.: Zdorovya, 224.

Bogen, M. M. (1985). Obuchenie dvigatelnym deystviyam. M.: Fizkultura i sport, 192.

Vygodskiy, L. S (1979) Problemy vozrastnoy periodizatsii detskogo razvitiya. Voprosy psikhologi, (2), 14 – 16.

Galperin, S. I. (1974). Anatomiya i fiziologiya cheloveka. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 468.

Zatsiorskiy, V. M. (1970). Fizicheskie kachestva sportsmena. M.: Fizkultura i sport, 200.

Ilin, E. P. (2003). Psikhomotornaya organizatsiya cheloveka : Ucheb. dlya vuzov. SPb.: Piter, 384.

Ilinich, V. I. (1991). Professionalno-prikladnaya fizicheskaya podgotovka studentov. K.: Gardariki, 380 – 432.

Ivashchenko, O.V. (2016). Modelling of physical education students: Monograph. Kharkiv: OVS (in Ukrainian)

Kalnitskiy, S. V. (2003). Formirovanie professionalno-vazhnykh kachestv kursantov finansovo-ekonomicheskogo voenno-uchebnogo zavedeniya sredstvami sportivnykh igr: Dissertatsiya kandidata pedagogicheskikh nauk 13.00.04 SPb., 175.

Kirichenko, S. I. (1998). Professionalno-prikladnaya fizicheskaya podgotovka studentov ekonomicheskogo fakulteta: Dissertatsiya kandidata pedagogicheskikh nauk: 13.00.04 M., 123.

Koliadenko, H. I. (2001). Anatomiia liudyny. K.: Lybid, 384.

Krutsevich, T. Yu. (1999). Metody issledovaniya individualnogo zdorovya detey i podrostkov v protsesse fizicheskogo vospitaniya. K.: Olimpiyskaya literatura, 232.

Matveev, L. P. (1990). Vospitanie fizicheskiy kachestv. M.: Prosveshchenie, S.

Matveev, L. P. (1991). Teoriya i metodika fizicheskoy kultury. M.: Fizkultura i sport, 544.

Platonov, V. N. (1990). Aktualnye problemy vysshey kkoly i puti perestroyki fіzkulturnogo obrazovaniya. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury, (4). 5 – 10.

Raevskiy, R. T. (1991). Professionalno-prikladnaya fizicheskaya podgotovka studentov tekhnicheskikh vuzov. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 136.

Romanenko, V. A. (1999). Dvigatelnye sposobnosti cheloveka. Donetsk.: Novyy mir, 336.

Serhiienko, L. P. (2001) Kompleksne testuvannia rukhovykh zdibnostei liudyny: Navchalnyi posibnyk. Mykolaiv: UDMTU, 360.

Serhiienko, S. V. (2004). Spetsialna fizychna pidhotovka u systemi profesiinoho navchannia fakhivtsiv podatkovoi militsii: Dysertatsiia kandydata nauk z fizychnoho vykh. i sportu. 24.00.02 Irpin, 191.

Solodkov, A. S., & Sologub, Ye. S. (2001). Fiziologiya cheloveka. M.: Terra-Sport, Olimpiya Press. 51

Tovt, V. A. (2000). Fizychne vykhovannia ta aktyvnist yak faktor adaptatsii molodi do vyshchoi shkoly. Pedahohika, (3), 72—75.

Tonkov, N. I. (1998). Professionalno-prikladnaya fizicheskaya kultura podgotovki spetsialistov ekonomicheskogo profilya: Dissertatsiya kandidata pedagogicheskikh nauk: 13.00.04 M., 136.

Falkova, N. I. (2002). Fizychna pidhotovka studentok ekonomichnykh spetsialnostei z urakhuvanniam yikh morfofuktsionalnykh osoblyvostei: Avtoreferat dysertatsii kandydata nauk z fizychnoho vykhovannia ta sportu: 24.00.02 L.: 20.

Fomin, N. A., & Filin V. P. (1972). Vozrastnye osnovy fizicheskogo vospitaniya. M.:Fizkultura i sport, 176.

Khudolii, O. M. (2007). Zahalni osnovy teorii ta metodyky fizychnoho vykhovannia: Navchalnyi posibnyk. Kharkiv: OVS, 406

Chaykin, I. N. (1999). Sportivnoe orietnirovanie v protsesse fizicheskoy podgtovki kursatnov vuzov: Atoreferat dissertatsii kandidata pedagogicheskikh nauk. 13.00.04 SPb.:19.

Ivashchenko, O. V. (2016). Methodic of pedagogic control of 16-17 years’ age girls’ motor fitness. Pedagogics, psychology, medical-biological problems of physical training and sports, 20(5), 26-32.

Published

2017-12-30

How to Cite

Chernenko, S., Oliinyk, O., Kapkan, O., & Malakhova, Z. (2017). Peculiarities of Higher Education Students’ Functional and Motor Preparedness. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 17(4), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2017.4.1201

Issue

Section

Physical Education of Various Population Groups