Assessment of a Healthy Lifestyle and Quality of Life of Men and Women in Modern Society Based on SF-36
Quality of life (QL) is defined as the subjective perception of one’s own well-being in a socio-cultural context, the satisfaction of one’s desires and the achievement of an ideal level of well-being. Quality of life is related to health (HRQOL), refers to the functioning and well-being in the physical, mental and social dimensions of life.
Research purpose: to analyze the main factors of quality of life of male and female population in modern Ukrainian society.
Material and Methods. 482 men and women aged 20-60 took part in sociological research.
The following research methods were used to solve the problemsset in the work: analysis and processing of special literature and data from the Internet; pedagogical observation; questionnaires (SF36); methods of mathematical statistics.
Results. The results of their own research show that the male population had a better quality of life on all scales of the SF-36 questionnaire compared to women (p <0.05). Respondents under the age of 20-29 had indicators of quality of life above average on the scales of physical and role physical functioning; pain in this age group did not have a significant impact on quality of life. The general state of health was assessed above the average level by respondents aged 20-29 and 30-39, regardless of gender, they were characterized by high scales of social activity and viability.
Conclusions. It is established that the indicator General health is a system-forming factor of quality of life for men and women in terms of the number of correlations. The obtained results allowed to determine the expediency and speed of implementation of preventive measures for men and women depending on the content of certain scales. Decreased overall health (GH) in men and women after the age of 50 significantly affects their quality of life, as evidenced by the large number of significant correlation coefficients. In women over 50 years of age, there is a sharp decrease in RP (role functioning due to physical condition) to 46 points, vital activity (VT) to 50 points, role functioning (due to emotional state) (RE) to 53 points. In men at this age, role functioning increases to 90 points, and social functioning (SF) to 89 points, which may indicate an uneven distribution of family and social functions in the lives of people of different sexes, overloading women with household chores, which prevents them from spending free time, affects the emotional state.
Brazier, J. (1993). The SF-36 health survey questionnaire – a tool for economists. Health Econ., 2(3), 213-5.
Wassertheil-Smoller, S., & Smoller, J. (2015). Mostly about quality of life. Biostatistics and epidemiology, 163-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2134-8_7
World Health Organization (2007). Steps to health: a European framework to promote physical activity for health. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/physical-activity/publications/2007/steps-to-health.-a-european-framework-to-promote-physical-activity-for-health-2007
World Health Organization (2013). Health 2020. A European policy framework and strategy for the 21st century. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/199532/Health2020-Long.pdf?ua=1
World Health Organization (2013). Strategy and action plan for healthy ageing in Europe, 2012–2020. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/175544/RC62wd10Rev1-Eng.pdf
World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (2013). Physical activity strategy for the WHO European Region 2016–2025. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/282961/65wd09e_PhysicalActivityStrategy_150474.pdf
World Health Organization (2018). European health report 2018: More than numbers - evidence for all. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/en/publications/abstracts/european-health-report-018.-more-than-numbers-evidence-for-all-2018
World Health Organization (2018). Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030. More active people for a healthier world. Geneva; Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272722/9789241514187-eng.pdf
Hardman, A., & Stensel, D. (2003). Physical activity and health: the evidence explained. London, Routledge.
Cavill, Nick, Kahlmeier, Sonja, & Racioppi, Francesca (2006). Physical activity and health in Europe: evidence for action. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe.
Krutsevich, Т., & Bezverhnia, H. (2010). Rekreatsiya u fizychniy kulturi riznykh hrup naselennya. Kyev: Olympyiskaia lyteratura.
Lee, I.M., Shiroma, E.J., Lobelo, F., Puska, P., Blair, S.N., & Katzmarzyk, P.T. (2012). Effect of physical inactivity on majornon-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet 380(9838), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61031-9
Imas, E., Dutchak, M., & Trachuk, S. (2013). Stratehyy y rekomendatsyy po zdorovomu obrazu zhyzny y dvyhatelnoi aktyvnosty: sbornyk materyalov Vsemyrnoi orhanyzatsyy zdravookhranenyia. Kyev: Olympyiskaia lyteratura.
WHO Quality of Life Assessment Group. (1996). What quality of life? / The WHOQOL Group. World Health Forum, 17(4), 354-356
Krutsevich, Т., & Imas, Т. (2013). Tsennostnyye oriyentatsii lits zrelogo vozrasta v provedenii dosuga. Sportivniy visnik Pridnнprov’ya, 2, 5-11.
Ware, J.E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S.D. (1994). SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User`s Manual. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center. Boston, Mass.
Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ., 21(2), 271-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00130-8
World Health Organization (2008). A healthy city is an active city: a physical activity planning guide. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/99975/E91883.pdf
Hallal, P.C., Andersen, L.B., Bull, F.C., Guthold, R., Haskell W., Ekelund, U. (2012). Global physical activity levels: surveillance, progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet 380(9838), 247-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1
Gesell, S., Tesdahl, E., & Ruchman, E. (2012). The distribution of physical activity in an after-school friendship network. Pediatrics 129(6),106471. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2567
Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (2013). Council recommendation on promoting health-enhancing physical activity across sectors. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/nutrition_physical_activity/docs/2013_ hepa_en.pdf
Hotting, K., & Roder, B. (2013). Beneficial effects of physical exercise on neuroplasticity and cognition. Neuroscience &Biobehavioral Reviews. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 37(9), 2243-2257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.04.005
Kirk-Sanchez, N.J., & McGough, E.L. (2014). Physical exercise and cognitive performance in the elderly: current perspectives. Clin Interv Aging, 9, 51-62. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S39506
Krutsevich, T., Pangelova, N., Trachuk, S., & Ivanik, O. (2019). Motor activity of the male and female population in modern society. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 19(3), 1591-1598. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2019.03231
Massalskii R.I. (2015). Issledovanie kachestva zhizni naseleniia Germanii s pomoshchiu oprosnika SF-36. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia, 2-1
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).