Analysis of Motor Abilities Development in Male and Female High Schoolers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2016.2.1162Keywords:
boys, girls, motor abilities, high schoolAbstract
The pupose of the research is to define the peculiarities of motor abilities development in male and female high schoolers.
Materials and methods. To solve the tasks set, the research relies on the following methods used: analysis of scientific literature, pedagogical testing and methods of mathematical statistics of data reduction. The participants in the study were 10 boys and 14 girls of the 10th grade, 14 boys and 10 girls of the 11th grade.
Conclusions. The level of motor abilities development in the 10th-11th-grade girls and the 11th-grade boys is at the sufficient level, while this level in the 10th-grade boys is average.
The statistically significant difference between the 10th-grade boys and girls is observed in the following tests: assessment of time parameters of movement (error in 10 seconds), assessment of perception of strength parameters of movement (standing long jump at ½ of MAX), bending and unbending of arms in suspension, bent suspension. The boys performed better in these tests than girls.
The statistically significant difference between the 11th-grade boys and girls shows in the following tests: jumping with “increases of weight”, assessment of time parameters of movement (error in 5, 10 seconds), assessment of perception of strength parameters of movement, shuttle run, bending and unbending of arms in suspension, bent suspension. The girls performed better in jumping with “increases of weight”, assessment of time parameters of movement, assessment of perception of strength parameters of movement.
The correlation analysis of the indicators of motor abilities development proves that the “shuttle run” test has more connections with the other tests in case of the 10th-grade girls (3 сonnections at r > 0.6); for the 10th-grade boys such tests are “bending and unbending of arms from the lying position”, “bending and unbending of arms in suspension” (5 сonnections at r > 0.6); for the 11th‑grade girls — “bending and unbending of arms from the lying position”, “bending and unbending of arms in suspension” (3 сonnections at r > 0.6); for the 11th-grade boys — “standing long jump at 2/3 of МАХ” (10 сonnections at r > 0.6).
Downloads
References
Bal’sevich V. K., & Zaporozhanov V. A. (1987). Fizicheskaya aktivnost’ cheloveka. K. : Zdorov’ya, 224.
Bal’sevich V.K. (2000). Ontokineziologiya cheloveka. M.: Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kul’tury, 275.
Dubrovskiy V. I. (2005). Sportivnaya meditsina: Uchebnik dlya studentov vuzov, obuchayushchikhsya po pedagicheskim spetsіal’nostyam. 3-e izd. M. : Gumanitar. izd. tsentr VLADOS, 528.
Iermakov S.S., Apanasenko G.L., Bondarenko T.V., & Prasol S. D. (2010). Fizicheskaya kul’tura — osnovnoy instrument kul’tury zdorov’ya. Pedagogіka, psikhologіya ta mediko-bіologіchnі problemi fіzichnogo vikhovannya і sportu, (11), 31-33
Ivashchenko O.V. (2001). Metodyka navchannya himnastychnym vpravam shkil’noyi prohramy. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna [Theory and methods of the physical education], (1), 26—31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17309/ tmfv.2001.1.7
Ivashchenko O.V., Karpunets T. V., & Krinin Yu. V. (2014). Vikova dinamika funktsionalnoyi, koordinatsiynoyi y silovoyi pidgotovlenosti divchat 8—9 klasiv. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna [Theory and methods of the physical education], (1), 34-42. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2014.1.1043
Ivashchenko O.V. & Dudnik Z.M. (2011). Vikovi osoblyvosti rozvytku rukhovykh zdibnostey divchat starshykh klasiv. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna [Theory and methods of the physical education], (8), 3—5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2011.8.727
Ivashchenko O.V. & Khudolii O.M. (2014). Osoblyvosti funktsional’noyi, koordynatsiynoyi i sylovoyi pidhotovlenosti khloptsiv 8—9 klasiv. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna [Theory and methods of the physical education], (1),15-23. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2014.1.1041
Ivashchenko, O., & Spesyvtsev, D. (2015). Vikovi osoblyvosti rozvytku rukhovykh zdibnostey u khloptsiv 12—14 rokiv. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna [Theory and methods of the physical education], (4), 32—38. doi: 10.17309/tmfv.2015.4.1154
Ivashchenko O.V., Khudolii O.M., Iermakov S. S., Chernenko S. O., & Holovko A. R. Pedahohichnyy kontrol’ rivnya rukhovoyi pidhotovlenosti khlopchykiv molodshykh klasiv. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna [Theory and methods of the physical education], (2), 32-40. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2015.2.1140
Krutsevich T.Yu. (1985). Nauchnye issledovaniya v massovoy fizicheskoy kul’ture. K.: Zdorov’ya, 30—35
Krutsevich T.Yu., & Bezverkhnya G.V. (2010). Rekreatsіya u fіzichnіy kul’turі rіznikh grup naselennya: Navch. posіbnik. K.: Olіmpіys’ka lіteratura, 248.
Linets’ M. M. (1997). Osnovi metodiki rozvitku rukhovikh yakostey : navch. posіb. L. : Shtabar, 207.
Lyakh V. І. (2000). Dvigatel’nye sposobnosti shkol’nikov: Osnovy teorii i metodiki razvitiya. M.: Terra — Sport, 192.
Nosko M.O., Yermakov S.S., & Harkusha S.V. (2010). Teoretyko-metodychni aspekty zmitsnennya fizychnoho zdorov»ya uchnivs’koyi ta student·s’koyi molodi. Visnyk Chernihivs’koho natsional’noho pedahohichnoho universytetu. Seriya : Pedahohichni nauky. Fizychne vykhovannya ta sport / Chernih. nats. ped. un-t im. T. H. Shevchenka. Chernihiv: Vyd-vo ChDPU, (76), 243—247.
Selezn’ova T. V. (2005). Testy i normatyvy dlya otsinky rozvytku koordynatsiynykh zdibnostey shkolyariv 7—17 rokiv v protsesi fizychnoho vykhovannya: metodychni rekomendatsiyi. Kherson: KhDU, 75.
Serhiyenko L. P. (2001). Testuvannya rukhovykh zdibnostey shkolyariv. K.: Olimpiys’ka literatura, 439.
Filin V.P., & Rovniy A.S. (1992). Metody issledovaniya v sporte: Uchebnoe posobie. Khar’kov: Osnova, 63—68.
Khudolіi O. M., & Karpunets’ T. V. Planuvannya eksperimentu v doslіdzhennі protsesu pіdgotovki yunikh gіmnastіv. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna [Theory and methods of the physical education], (4), 2—8. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2002.4.73
Khudolіi O. M.(2010). Bіologіchnі, psikhologo-pedagogіchnі zakonomіrnostі rukhovoї dіyal’nostі lyudini. Dopovіd’ І. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna [Theory and methods of the physical education], (4), 19— 34. Режим доступу: http://www.tmfv.com.ua/journal/ issue/view/66.
Khudolіy O. M. (2010). Bіologіchnі, psikhologo-pedagogіchnі zakonomіrnostі rukhovoї dіyal’nostі lyudini. Dopovіd’ ІІ. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna [Theory and methods of the physical education], (5), 19— 27. Режим доступу: http://www.tmfv.com.ua/journal/ issue/view/67.
Khudolii O. M. (2009). Tekhnolohiya navchannya himnastychnym vpravam. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna [Theory and methods of the physical education], (8), 19-34. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2009.9.562
Khudoliy O.M. (2008). Zahal’ni osnovy teoriyi i metodyky fizychnoho vykhovannya: Navchal’nyy posibnyk. Kharkiv: «OVS», 406.
Khudolii O.M. (2011). Zakonomirnosti rozvytku sylovykh zdibnostey u fizychnomu vykhovanni i sporti. Povidomlennya IІ. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna [Theory and methods of the physical education], (2), 19—34. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2011.2.690
Khudolii О. М., & Ivashchenco О. V. (2011). Pedahohichna praktyka v shkoli. Povidomlennya ІІ. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna [Theory and methods of the physical education], (9), 19—32. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2011.9.740
Khudolii O. M., Ivashchenko O. V., & Pimenov O. O. (2012). Osoblyvosti sylovoyi pidhotovlenosti shkolyariv starshykh klasiv. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna [Theory and methods of the physical education], (9), 37—41. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2012.9.822.
Khudolii O. M., Ivashchenko O. V., & Karpunets’ T. V. (2012). Robocha prohrama z pedahohichnoyi praktyky v shkoli (IV kurs, napryam pidhotovky: 6.01020 Fizychne vykhovannya). Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna [Theory and methods of the physical education], (9), 19—31. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2012.9.821
Khudoley O. N. (2012). Zakonomernosti formirovaniya dvigatel’nykh navykov u yunykh gimnastov. Nauka v olimpiyskom sporte, (1), 36—46.
Khudolii O. M. & O. V. Ivashchenko (2014). Osoblyvosti funktsional’noyi, koordynatsiynoyi i sylovoyi pidhotovlenosti divchat 7—8 klasiv. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna [Theory and methods of the physical education], (2), 15-21. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2014.2.1095
Khudolii, O. M., & Ivashchenko, O. V. (2014). Teoriya i metodyka vykladannya gimnastyky: Navchal’nyy posibnyk. Kharkiv: “OVS”, 384.
ХKhudolii, O. M., & Ivashchenko, O. V. (2014). Osnovy naukovo-doslidnoyi roboty u fizychnomu vykhovanni i sporti: Navchal’nyy posibnyk. Kharkiv: “OVS”, 320.
Khudolii O.M.& Ivashchenko O.V. (2014). Modelyuvannya protsesu navchannya ta rozvytku rukhovykh zdibnostey u ditey i pidlitkiv: Monohrafiya. Kharkiv: OVS, 320.
Shyyan B. M. (2001). Teoriya i metodyka fizychnoho vykhovannya shkolyariv. Ternopil’: Navchal’na knyha — Bohdan, 272.
Shyyan B. M., & Papusha V. H. (2005). Metodyka vykladannya sportyvno-pedahohichnykh dystsyplin u vyshchykh navchal’nykh zakladakh fizychnoho vykhovannya i sportu: Navchal’nyy posibnyk. Kharkiv: «OVS», 208.
Ivashchenko O.V., & Yermakova T.S. (2015). Assessment of functional, coordination and power fitness of 7-8 form boys. Pedagogics, psychology, medical-biological problems of physical training and sports, (9), 20-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2015.0903
Ivashchenko O.V., & Yermakova T.S. (2015). Structural model of in-group dynamic of 6-10 years old boys’ motor fitness. Pedagogics, psychology, medical-biological problems of physical training and sports, (10), 24-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2015.1004
Ivashchenko, O.V., Yermakova, T.S., Cieslicka, M., & Zukowska, H. (2015). Discriminant analysis in classification of motor fitness of 9–11 forms’ juniors. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 15(2), 238–244. doi:10.7752/jpes.2015.02037
Ivashchenko, O.V., Yermakova, T.S., Cieslicka, & M., Muszkieta, R. (2015). Discriminant analysis as method of pedagogic control of 9–11 forms girls’ functional and motor fitness. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 15(3), 576–581. doi:10.7752/jpes.2015.03086
Ivashchenko Olga, Oleg Khudolii, Tetiana Yermakova , Sergii Iermakov, Mykola Nosko, & Yuliya Nosko (2016). Factorial and discriminant analysis as methodological basis of pedagogic control over motor and functional fitness of 14–16 year old girls. Journal of Physical Education and Sport (JPES), 16(2), Art 68, 442 – 451. doi:10.7752/jpes.2016.02068
Khudolii, O.M., Iermakov, S.S., & Ananchenko, K.V. (2015). Factorial model of motor fitness of junior forms’ boys. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 15(3), 585–591. doi:10.7752/jpes.2015.03088
Khudolii O.M., & Titarenco A.A. (2013). The effectiveness of development programming strength in primary school children. Pedagogics, psychology, medical-biological problems of physical training and sports, 2013, vol.7, pp. 83-88. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.744827
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
