Motor Abilities: Peculiarities of Strength Effort Assessment in Boys Aged 11–13
The purpose of the study is to determine the peculiarities of strength effort assessment in boys aged 11–13.
Materials and methods. The study participants were boys aged 11 years (n = 22), 12 years (n = 31), 13 years (n = 33). The children and their parents were fully informed about all the features of the study and gave their consent to participate in the experiment. The paper used methods of scientific literature analysis, testing, methods of mathematical statistics. The study assessed the right hand effort at 1/3, 1/2, 2/3 of the maximum. The assessment error was analyzed. To determine the peculiarities of strength effort assessment, the study used a t-test for paired observations and a t-test for independent samples.
Results. The analysis of the ability for strength effort assessment in the boys aged 11 and 13 showed that there are no statistically significant differences between the boys of this age. The boys demonstrate the best assessment of effort at 2/3 of the maximum. There are no statistically significant differences in the levels of development of the hand maximum strength (p > 0.05). The study has not found statistically significant differences in the levels of development of the ability for strength effort assessment in the boys aged 11–13 (p > 0.05). The boys of this age demonstrate the best assessment of effort at 2/3 of the maximum. A comparative analysis of the ability for strength effort assessment in the boys aged 12 and 13 did not reveal statistically significant differences (p > 0.05). The boys of this age demonstrate the best assessment of effort at 2/3 of the maximum. The boys aged 11–13 show the best assessment of effort reproduction at 2/3 of the maximum (p < 0.05). There is no statistically significant age-related dynamics in strength effort assessment in the boys aged 11–13. The correlation between the effort reproductions at 1/3, 1/2 and 2/3 of the maximum is not statistically significant.
Conclusions. In the process of physical education of boys aged 11–13, special attention should be paid to the development of motor control ability as the component of coordination training of schoolchildren.
Krutsevich, T. Yu. (2000). Upravlenie fizicheskim sostoyaniem podrostkov v sisteme fizicheskogo vospitaniya. K., 510.
Krutsevich, T.Yu. (2000). Prognoznye modeli garmonichnosti fizicheskogo razvitiya podrostkov. Pedagogіka, psikhologіya ta mediko-bіologіchnі problemi fіzichnogo vikhovannya і sportu, (12) 48-55.
Ivashchenko, O.V. (2016). Modeliuvannia protsesu fizychnoho vykhovannia shkoliariv: Monohrafiia. Kharkiv: OVS.
Farfel, V. S. (2011). Upravlenie dvizheniiami v sporte. M. : Sovetskii sport, 202.
Serhiienko, L.P., Chekmarova, N.H., & Khadzhynov, V.A. (2012). Psykhomotoryka: kontrol ta otsinka rozvytku : [Navchalnyi posibnyk]. Kharkiv : OVS, 270.
Balsevich, V.K. (2000). Ontokineziologiia cheloveka. M. : Teoriia i praktika fizicheskoi kultury, 275.
Ilin, E. P. (2003). Psikhomotornaia organizatciia cheloveka : ucheb. dlia vuzov. SPb. : Piter, 384.
Lopatiev, A., Ivashchenko, O., Khudolii, O., Pjanylo, Y., Chernenko, S., & Yermakova, T. (2017). Systemic approach and mathematical modeling in physical education and sports. Journal of Physical Education and Sport (JPES), 17(1), 146-155. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2017.s1023
Nosko, M. O. (2002). Problema udoskonalennia rukhovoi funktsii v protsesi navchannia. Pedahohika, psykholohiia ta medyko-biolohichni problemy fizychnoho vykhovannia i sportu : zb. nauk. pr. za red. S. S. Yermakova. Kh., 2002. № 1. S. 19–31.
Krutsevych, T.Iu., Vorobiov, V. I., & Bezverkhnia, H. V. (2011). Kontrol u fizychnomu vykhovanni ditei, pidlitkiv i molodi: navch. posib. K.: Olimp. l-ra, 224.
Liakh, V.I. (2000). Dvigatelnye sposobnosti shkolnikov: Osnovy teorii i metodiki razvitiia. M.: Terra–Sport, 192.
Liakh, V.I. (2001). Testy u fizicheskom vospitanii shkolnikov. M.: Fizkultura i sport, 114.
Khudolii, O.M. (2008). Zahalni osnovy teorii i metodyky fizychnoho vykhovannia: Navchalnyi posibnyk. Kharkiv: OVS.
Khudolii, O.M. & Ivashchenko, O.V. (2014). Modeliuvannia protsesu navchannia ta rozvytku rukhovykh zdibnostei u ditei i pidlitkiv: Monohrafiia. Kharkiv: OVS, 320.
Bodnar, I., & Andres, A. (2016). Tests and standards for express-control of physical fitness and health of middle school age pupils. Pedagogics, Psychology, Medical-Biological Problems of Physical Training and Sports, 20(4), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2016.0402
Ivashchenko, O. V., & Kapkan, O. O. (2016). Informative pedagogic control indicators of 14-15 years age girls’ motor fitness. Pedagogics, psychology, medical-biological problems of physical training and sports, 20(6), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2016.0603
Ivashchenko, O., Khudolii, O., Iermakov, S., & Prykhodko, V. (2018). Coordinating abilities: recognition of a state of development of 11-13 years old boys. Pedagogics, Psychology, Medical-Biological Problems of Physical Training and Sports, 22(2), 86-91. https://doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2018.0204
Ivashchenko, O., Khudolii, O., Iermakov, S., Lochbaum, M., Cieślicka, M., Zukow, W., Nosko, M., & Yermakova, T. (2017). Methodological approaches to pedagogical control of the functional and motor fitness of the girls from 7-9 grades. Journal of Physical Education and Sport (JPES), 17(1), 254-261. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2017.s1023
Li, K., Su, W., Fu, H., & Pickett, K. A. (2015). Kinesthetic deficit in children with developmental coordination disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.013
Brink, A. O., & Jacobs, A. B. (2011). Kinesthetic Sensitivity and Related Measures of Hand Sensitivity in Children With Nonproficient Handwriting. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 23(1), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e318208cc81
Morash, V., Pensky, A. E. C., Alfaro, A. U., & McKerracher, A. (2012). A Review of Haptic Spatial Abilities in the Blind. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 12(2-3), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2011.599901
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).