Pattern Recognition: Physical Exercises Modes During Motor Skills Development in Girls Aged 14
The study objective is to determine physical exercises modes when developing motor skills in girls aged 14.
Materials and methods. The participants in the study were 40 girls aged 14. To achieve the objective set, the following research methods were used: study and analysis of scientific and methodological literature; pedagogical observation, timing of training tasks; pedagogical experiment, methods of mathematical statistics, methods of mathematical experiment planning, discriminant analysis. Results. The first canonical function explains 73.3% of the variation in results, the second function – 21.6%, which indicates their high informativity (r1=0.898; r2=0.743). The analysis of canonical functions highlights the statistical significance of the first and second canonical functions (λ1=.067; р1=0.001; λ2=0.346; р2=0.001). The first and second functions have a high discriminative ability and value of interpretation with respect to the general totality. The number of repetitions for mastering the first and fourth series of training tasks has the largest contribution to the first canonical function. This indicates that the exercises for developing motor abilities and teaching to control movement time and muscular effort influence the effectiveness of teaching a press headstand and handstand. The number of repetitions for mastering the second and third series of training tasks has the largest contribution to the second canonical function. This indicates that starting and ending positions, and actions without which the exercise performance is impossible influence the effectiveness of teaching a press headstand and handstand.
Conclusions. The discriminant function structure coefficients show that the training program effectiveness is determined by selecting the series of training tasks and their performance modes. To choose the most rational mode of exercises of the series of tasks when teaching girls aged 14 a press headstand and handstand, the first discriminant function can be used with an emphasis on the most informative variables.
Lopatiev, A., Ivashchenko, O., Khudolii, O., Pjanylo, Y., Chernenko, S. & Yermakova T. (2017). Systemic approach and mathematical modeling in physical education and sports. Journal of Physical Education and Sport (JPES), 17(1), suplement, 146-155. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2017.s1023
Ivashchenko, O., Iermakov, S., Khudolii, O., Yermakova, T., Cieślicka, M., & Harkusha, S. (2018). Simulation of the regularities of physical exercises learning process of boys aged 8 years old. Pedagogics, Psychology, Medical-Biological Problems of Physical Training and Sports, 22(1), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2018.0102
Judith Rink, Laura Jones, Kym Kirby, Murray Mitchell, & Panayiotis Doutis(2007). Teacher Perceptions of a Physical Education Statewide Assessment Program. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78(3), 204-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2007.10599418
Balaban, V. (2018). The relationship between objectively measured physical activity and fundamental motor skills in 8 to 11 years old children from the Czech Republic. Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 7(2), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.26773/mjssm.180902
Ivashchenko, O. (2017). Classification of 11-13 yrs girls’ motor fitness, considering level of physical exercises’ mastering. Pedagogics, Psychology, Medical-Biological Problems of Physical Training and Sports, 21(2), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2017.0203
Ivashchenko, O.V. (2016). Modelling of physical education students: Monograph. Kharkiv: OVS (in Ukrainian)
Acher, A., Arca, M., & Sanmarti, N. (2007). Modeling as a teaching learning process for understanding materials: A case study in primary education. Science Education, 91(3), 398–418. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20196
Chatzipanteli, A., Digelidis, N., Karatzoglidis, C., & Dean, R. (2016). A tactical-game approach and enhancement of metacognitive behaviour in elementary school students. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(2),169–184. https:/doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2014.931366
Chernenko, S.O. (2015). Effectieness of junior form pupils’ training of gymnastic exercises in different modes of their fulfillment. Pedagogics, Psychology, Medical-Biological Problems Of Physical Training And Sports, 19(8), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2015.0809
Correa, A. A., Grima, P., & Tort-Martorell, X. (2009). Experimentation order with good properties for 2k factorial designs. Journal of Applied Statistics, 36(7), 743–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760802499337
Correa, A. A., Grima, P., & Tort-Martorell, X. (2012). Experimentation order in factorial designs: new findings. Journal of Applied Statistics, 39(7), 1577–1591. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2012.661706
García-Moya, I., Moreno, C., & Jiménez-Iglesias, A. (2012). Building a composite factorial score for the assessment of quality of parent–child relationships in adolescence. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10(5), 642–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.707781
Kapkan, O.O. (2015). Features of 14-15 years’ age boys’ training to physical exercises. Pedagogics, Psychology, Medical-Biological Problems Of Physical Training And Sports, 19(9), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2015.0904
Wang, A., Karns, J. T., & Meredith, W. (2003). Motivation, Stress, Self-Control Ability, and Self-Control Behavior of Preschool Children in China. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 17(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540309595008
Wright Steven (1999). A compatative view of teaching practice in Physical Education. International Sports Studies, 21(1), 55-68.
Samuel, R. D., Zavdy, O., Levav, M., Reuveny, R., Katz, U., & Dubnov-Raz, G. (2017). The Effects of Maximal Intensity Exercise on Cognitive Performance in Children. Journal of Human Kinetics, 57(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0050
Khudolii, O. M., & Iermakov, S. S. (2011). Regularities of the learning process of young gymnasts. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, 0(5), 3-18, 35–41. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2011.5.707
Cantell, M. H., Smyth, M. M., & Ahonen, T. P. (2003). Two distinct pathways for developmental coordination disorder: Persistence and resolution. Human Movement Science, 22(4-5), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2003.09.002
Donovan, C. B., Mercier, K., & Phillips, S. R. (2015). Investigating Attitudes Toward Physical Education: Validation Across Two Instruments. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 19(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2015.1012511
Herrmann, C., Gerlach, E., & Seelig, H. (2016). Basic motor competences in primary school. Rationale, assessment and empirical testing of a measurement instrument. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 46(2), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-015-0378-8
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).