Trust as a Mechanism of Role-Dependent Regulation in Acrobatic Pairs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2026.3.19Keywords:
interpersonal trust, partner compatibility, dyadic interaction, interpersonal coordination, functional role asymmetry, acrobatic gymnasticsAbstract
Objectives. This study aimed to examine how cognitive and affective trust are organized within acrobatic pairs depending on compatibility type and partner role. It was hypothesized that trust organization varies across compatibility configurations and partner roles, and that the balance between cognitive and affective trust reflects distinct mechanisms of interaction regulation associated with responsibility distribution and regulatory tension within the dyadic system.
Materials and Methods. The study involved 25 acrobatic pairs (N = 50 athletes) aged 11–16 years competing in acrobatic gymnastics at the stage of preliminary basic training. Compatibility types were determined according to a typology of acrobatic pair compatibility previously developed by the authors. The typology integrates indicators of technical execution reliability, postural and phase coordination, and emotional–expressive coherence. Interpersonal trust was assessed using an adapted version of Daniel J. McAllister’s Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust Scale. Nonparametric statistical procedures were applied, including Kruskal–Wallis tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, and Dwass–Steel–Critchlow–Fligner post-hoc comparisons.
Results. The findings revealed generally high levels of interpersonal trust between partners. No statistically significant differences between partner roles were identified. However, the structure of trust organization differed across compatibility types. Functionally oriented pairs demonstrated relatively higher cognitive trust, whereas expressively oriented pairs exhibited relatively higher affective trust. Complex synergy pairs showed consistently high levels of both trust components and demonstrated the highest values on the trust balance index, indicating a more integrated mechanism of interaction regulation.
Conclusions. Trust in acrobatic pairs functions not only as an individual psychological characteristic but also as a mechanism regulating interaction within a functionally asymmetric partnership. Variations in the balance between cognitive and affective trust reflect different coordination mechanisms associated with the distribution of responsibility, emotional synchronization, and interaction stability in acrobatic pairs.Downloads
References
Eccles, D.W., & Tenenbaum, G. (2004). Why an expert team is more than a team of experts: A social-cognitive conceptualization of team coordination and communication in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 542-560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.26.4.542
Denysenko, V. (2020). Special physical training of acrobats taking into account the requirements of the selected amplua (on the example of the base partners). Journal of Education, Health and Sport, 10(4), 262-271. https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2020.10.04.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2020.10.04.029
Araújo, D., Davids, K., & Hristovski, R. (2006). The ecological dynamics of decision making in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 653-676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.07.002
Passos, P., Cordovil, R., Fernandes, O., & Barreiros, J. (2012). Perceiving affordances in rugby union. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30, 1177-1184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.695082
Marsh, K.L., Richardson, M.J., & Schmidt, R.C. (2009). Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 320-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01022.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01022.x
Vicaria, I.M., & Dickens, L. (2016). Meta-analyses of the intra- and interpersonal outcomes of interpersonal coordination. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 40, 335-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-016-0238-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-016-0238-8
Maksymov, S., & Denysenko, V. (2025). Tekhnichna spratsovanist akrobatychnykh skladiv yak bahatovymirna kharakterystyka spilnoi diialnosti. Fizychne vykhovannia ta sport, 4, 29-39. https://doi.org/10.26661/2663-5925-2025-4-04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26661/2663-5925-2025-4-04
Hoehl, S., Fairhurst, M., & Schirmer, A. (2021). Interactional synchrony: Signals, mechanisms and benefits. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(1-2), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa024
Fédération Internationale de Gymnastique. (2024). Code of points: Acrobatic gymnastics 2025-2028. FIG.
Odynets, T., Todorova, V., & Sosina, V. (2023). Features of choreographic training for athletes in technical and aesthetic sports. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 23(9), 2409-2416. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.09277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.09277
Maksymov, S., Denysenko, V., & Maksymova, Yu. (2026). Emotsiino-vyrazna spratsovanist yak komponent sumisnosti partneriv u sportyvnii akrobatytsi. Sport Science Spectrum, 1, 78-84. https://doi.org/10.32782/spectrum/2026-1-10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/spectrum/2026-1-10
Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2021). Progress in joint-action research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(2), 138-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420984425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420984425
Marschner, M., Dignath, D., & Knoblich, G. (2024). Me or we? Action-outcome learning in synchronous joint action. Cognition, 247, 105785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105785 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105785
Dockendorff, M., Schmitz, L., Knoblich, G., & Vesper, C. (2025). Joint action partners modulate the first step of an action sequence to communicate a distal goal. Acta Psychologica, 253, 104724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104724
Schmidt, R.C., & Richardson, M.J. (2008). Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In A. Fuchs & V.K. Jirsa (Eds.), Coordination: Neural, behavioral and social dynamics (pp. 281-308). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74479-5_14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74479-5_14
Richardson, M.J., Marsh, K.L., & Baron, R.M. (2007). Judging and actualizing intrapersonal and interpersonal affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 845-859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.845
Słowiński, P., Zhai, C., Alderisio, F., Tsaneva-Atanasova, K., & Di Bernardo, M. (2016). Dynamic similarity promotes interpersonal coordination in joint action. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 13, 20151093. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.1093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.1093
Török, G., Pomiechowska, B., Csibra, G., & Sebanz, N. (2019). Rationality in joint action: Maximizing coefficiency in coordination. Psychological Science, 30(6), 930-941. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619842550 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619842550
McAllister, D.J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59. https://doi.org/10.2307/256727 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/256727
Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., & Schoorman, F.D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
Carron, A.V., Hausenblas, H.A., & Eys, M.A. (2012). Group dynamics in sport (4th ed.). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
Filho, E. (2020). Shared zones of optimal functioning (SZOF): A framework to define peak performance, momentum, psychobiosocial synchrony, and leader-follower dynamics in teams. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 14(4), 330-358. https://doi.org/10.1123/jcsp.2019-0054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jcsp.2019-0054
McGuire, C.S., Eys, M., Dithurbide, L., & Martin, L.J. (2025). It’s allowing space for vulnerability: Exploring athletes’ experiences with trust in interdependent sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 47(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2024-0050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2024-0050
Simpson, J.A. (2007). Psychological foundations of trust. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(5), 264-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00517.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00517.x
Rotenberg, K.J., Petrocci, S., Levante, A., & Lecchiso, F. (Eds.). (2025). Handbook of trust and social psychology. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803929415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803929415
Boukarras, S., Placidi, V., Rossano, F., Era, V., Aglioti, S.M., & Candidi, M. (2025). Neurophysiological dynamics of interpersonal coordination during joint action. Psychophysiology, 62(3), e70031. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70031
Mayo, O., & Gordon, I. (2025). Contextual pulls for synchrony and segregation: An empirical test of a novel theoretical framework. American Psychologist. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001659 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001659
Liu, X., Wu, B., Weng, X., & Shan, Q. (2023). The effect of the partnership between DanceSport couples on competitive performance: The mediating role of athlete engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1278874. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1278874 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1278874
Zhao, Q., Zhao, W., Lu, C., Du, H., & Chi, P. (2024). Interpersonal neural synchronization during social interactions in close relationships: A systematic review and meta-analysis of fNIRS hyperscanning studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 158, 105565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105565 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105565
Maksymov, S.D., & Maksymova, Yu. A. (2025). Typolohiia sumisnosti akrobatychnykh par na osnovi tekhnichnoi spratsovanosti ta emotsiino-artystychnoi uzghodzhenosti. Akademichni vizii, 49. https://academy-vision.org/index.php/av/article/view/2716
Leite, I. (2025). Biomechanical insights into the interaction between acrobatic gymnasts performing partner-assisted flight. Doctoral thesis, University of Porto.
Leite, I., Fonseca, P., Avila-Carvalho, L., & Vilas-Boas, J.P. (2023). Biomechanical research methods used in acrobatic gymnastics: A systematic review. Biomechanics, 3(1), 52-68. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics3010005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics3010005
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yuliya Maksymova, Valentyna Voronova, Stanislav Maksymov, Vladyslava Denysenko, Iryna Kolesnik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
