Global Communication Competence: a Framework of Intercultural Skills Development in Sport and Tourism Higher Education
Purpose. The research aims at multi-faceted study of global communication competence, which is a vital soft skill for professional development of students, acquiring their degrees in sport and tourism.
Materials and methods. Qualitative research methods applied in the research include theoretical analysis of relevant scientific findings, synthesis and modelling, pedagogical observation and evaluation. Quantitative analysis relates to questioning and data processing, in particular, 50-question Intercultural Quiz, conducted among 352 students of NUUPES and NUFT.
Results. The conducted research of global communication competence of the first and fifth year university sport and tourism students shows clear correlation between the level of education and gained global communication expertise, presented by the communicative skills of critical thinking and cooperation. The analysis of statistic data has proved that along with improved self-awareness, disciplines more than doubled students’ global communication competence within five academic years. In addition to quantitative improvement, the quality of the intercultural communication is enhanced, as essential professional skills are gained in the sphere of students’ future occupation. Professional orientation of global communication competence outlines sportive and medical inclination of NUUPES students’ higher education, and tourism and hospitality focus of NUFT students’ training.
Conclusions. The results of the study have proven that contemporary university students who get degrees in the fields of sport and tourism perceive culturally-bound information when attending their on-line and off-line academic courses and participating in various multicultural events in and outside university setting. In this way they acquire attitudes and values of self-awareness and recognition of ethnical diversity. Established values transform into production and result in implementation of culturally aware behaviour, represented by a high level of self-evaluation and persuasion abilities directed to effective, yet tolerant way of problem solving and shared responsibility.
Bender, C., Wright, D., & Lopatto, D. (2009). Students’ Self-Reported Changes in Intercultural Knowledge and Competence Associated with Three Undergraduate Science Experiences. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, XVIII (Fall), 307-322. Retrieved from http://www.frontiersjournal.com/documents/FrontiersXVIII-Fall09-Bender-Wright-Lopatto.pdf
Berardo, K. & Deardorff D. (2012). Building Cultural Competence: Innovative Models and Activities. Stylus, Sterling, VA.
Bertelsen, O. W., & Bodker, S. (2003). Chapter 11: Activity Theory (PDF). In Carroll, J.M. (ed.). HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Toward an Interdisciplinary Science, 291-324.
Blynova, O. Ye., Holovkova, L. S., & Sheviakov, O. V. (2018). Philosophical and sociocultural dimensions of personality psychological security. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 14, 73-83.
Boix Mansilla, V. (2016). How to be a global thinker. Educational Leadership, 74/4, 10-16.
Deardorff, D. (2006). Identification and Assessment of Intercultural Competence as a Student Outcome of Internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241-366.
Dennis, J. P., & Vander Wal, J. S. (2010). The Cognitive Flexibility Inventory: Instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 241-253.
Doscher, S. P. (2012). The development of rubrics to measure undergraduate students’ global awareness and global perspective: a validity study”. Doctoral Dissertation, Florida International University.
Edwards, L., Bryant, A., Keegan, R., Morgan, K., & Jones, A. (2017). Definitions, foundations and associations of physical literacy: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 47(1), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-0160560-7
Fantini, A.E. (2009). Assessing Intercultural Competence: Issues and Tools. In D. Deardorff (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Intercultural Competence (456-476). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fritz, W., Mollenberg, A. & Chen, G. M. (2002). Measuring intercultural sensitivity in different cultural contexts. Intercultural Communication Studies, 11(2), 165-176.
Fry, M. D., Guivernau, M., Kim, M., Newton, M., Gano-Overway, L. A., & Magyar, T. M. (2012). Youth Perceptions of a Caring Climate, Emotional Regulation, and Psychological Well-being. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 1(1), 44-57. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025454
Garrett A. Stone, Lauren N. Duffy, Harrison P. Pinckney & R. Templeton-Bradley (2017). Teaching for critical thinking: preparing hospitality and tourism students for careers in the twenty-first century. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism,17(2), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2017.1279036
Gay, G. (2015). Teaching to and through cultural diversity. Curriculum Inquiry, 43(1), 48-70.
Hadis, B. F. (2005). Gauging the impact of study abroad: how to overcome the limitations of a single-cell design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042003243869
Hakman, A., Medved, A., Moseychuk, Y., & Muzhychok, V. (2017). Analysis of Features of Motivational Priorities to Recreation and Recreational Activities of Different Groups of People. Physical Education, Sport and Health Culture in Modern Society, (2(38), 85-90. https://doi.org/10.29038/2220-7481-2017-02-85-90 (in Ukrainian)
Hoff, H. (2014). A critical discussion of Byram’s model of intercultural communicative competence in the light of Bildung theories. Intercultural Education, 25(6), 508-517. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2014.992112
Karaman, A. C. and Tochon F. V. (2007). International student teaching in world language education: Critical criteria for global teacherhood. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 4(2-3), 237-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427580701389714
Laal, M. & Laal, A. & Aliramaei, A. (2014). Continuing Education; Lifelong Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4052-4056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.889
Lázár, I. (ed.) (2012). Recognising Intercultural Competence: What Shows That I Am Interculturally Competent? Council of Europe, Strasbourg. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/education/Pestalozzi/ home/What/ICCTool_en.asp
Mahon, J. A., & Cushner, K. (2014). Revising and updating the inventory of cross-cultural sensitivity. Intercultural Education, 25(6), 484-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2014.990232
Morais, D. B., & Ogden, A. C. (2011). Initial Development and Validation of the Global Citizenship Scale. Journal of Studies in International Education, 15(5), 445-466. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315310375308
OECD (2018). Preparing our Youth for an Inclusive and Sustainable World: The OECD PISA global competence framework. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/Global-competency-for-an-inclusive-world.pdf
Ritchhart, R., Church, M., & Morrison, K. (2011). Making Thinking Visible: How to Promote Engagement, Understanding, and Independence for All Learners. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, 320.
Siedentop, D., & Tannehill, D. (2000). Developing Teaching Skills in Physical Education (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 380.
UNESCO (2013). Intercultural Competences: Conceptual and Operational Framework. UNESCO, Paris. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000219768
Whitehead, M. (2007). Physical literacy: Philosophical considerations in relation to developing a sense of self, universality, and propositional knowledge. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 1(3), 281-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17511320701676916
Willingham, D. T. (2007). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach? American Educator, 8-19.
Zuckerman, E. (2013). Rewire: Digital Cosmopolitans in the Age of Connection. W. W. Norton & Company.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).