Emotional Synchronisation and Motor Coordination in Artistic Swimming: The Role of Team Cohesion in Synchronised Performance

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2026.3.22

Keywords:

artistic swimming, team cohesion, motor synchronisation, emotional attunement, sports psychology, team performance

Abstract

Background. Motor synchronisation is a key determinant of performance in artistic swimming; however, it is primarily analysed from a technical perspective, with limited consideration of emotional and relational processes within the team. A more comprehensive understanding of synchronised performance requires analysis of the interaction between emotional attunement, team cohesion, and collective motor coordination.

Objectives. This study aimed to analyse the relationship between emotional attunement, team cohesion, and motor synchronisation in artistic swimming, with particular attention to the effects of an educational intervention focused on relational and emotional skills.

Materials and Methods. A mixed-methods quasi-experimental design was employed. The sample consisted of 150 competitive artistic swimmers aged 17–28 years, divided into an experimental group and a control group. Participants were additionally stratified into three age subgroups (17–19, 20–23, and 24–28 years). The experimental group underwentan educational programme designed to enhance team cohesion and emotional awareness. Quantitative data were collected using the Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ) and structured video analysis of routines, whereas qualitative data were obtained through focus groups. Independent samples t-tests and subgroup analyses were conducted. A two-way ANOVA (Group × Age group) was performed to examine the interaction between intervention and age.

Results. The experimental group demonstrated significantly higher levels of group cohesion across all GEQ dimensions compared to the control group (e.g., Group Integration–Task: M = 7.8 vs. 6.5; t = 4.21; p < .01; d = 0.78). Similar differences were identified for Group Integration–Social (M = 7.6 vs. 6.3; p < .01) and Individual Attraction dimensions (p < .05). The experimental group also achieved significantly higher motor synchronisation scores across all indicators, including temporal precision (87% vs. 74%), body position uniformity (85% vs. 72%), synchronisation with music (88% vs. 76%), and execution timing consistency (86% vs. 73%) (p < .05). These differences remained stable across all age subgroups. ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of group (p < .01), whereas the main effect of age and the interaction effect (Group × Age group) were non-significant (p > .05). Qualitative findings additionally highlighted the importance of trust, non-verbal communication, and shared emotional states in facilitating coordination.

Conclusions. Motor synchronisation in artistic swimming should be considered not only a technical skill but also a multidimensional process influenced by emotional attunement and team cohesion. Educational interventions targeting relational and emotional dynamics may substantially improve collective coordination and performance quality in team sports, independently of age-related differences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Giovanna Scala, Università degli studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli

Department of Education,
Viale Ellittico, 31, 81100 Caserta CE, Italy
scala.nina001@gmail.com

Federica Badii Esposito, University of Naples Parthenope

Department of Medical, Motor and Wellness Sciences,
Naples, Italy
federica.badiiesposito@parthenope.it

Domenico Tafuri, University of Naples Parthenope

Department of Medical, Motor and Wellness Sciences,
Naples, Italy
domenico.tafurii@parthenope.it

References

Mountjoy, M. (2009). Injuries and medical issues in synchronized swimming. Clinical Sports Medicine, 28(2), 253-264.

Vathagavorakul, R., Gonjo, T., & Homma, M. (2020). Underwater and above-water coordination in artistic swimming performance. Sports Biomechanics, 19(4), 455-468.

Eys, M.A., Evans, M.B., Martin, L.J., & Bruner, M.W. (2015). Team cohesion and team performance in sport. In M.R. Beauchamp & M.A. Eys (Eds.), Group dynamics in exercise and sport psychology (2nd ed., pp. 213-226). Routledge.

Carron, A.V., Colman, M.M., Wheeler, J., & Stevens, D. (2002). Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24(2), 168-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.24.2.168

Eccles, D.W., & Tenenbaum, G. (2004). Why an expert team is more than a team of experts: A cognitive conceptualization of team coordination and communication in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26(4), 542-560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.26.4.542

Cooke, N.J., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J.A., & Stout, R.J. (2000). Measuring team knowledge. Human Factors, 42(1), 151-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1518/001872000779656561

Carron, A.V., Widmeyer, W.N., & Brawley, L.R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7(3), 244-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.7.3.244

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Di Palma, D., Tafuri, M.G., & Ogbondah, L.D. (2025). Sport as a tool for inclusion and sustainability in secondary school: A qualitative-quantitative analysis. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilità, 10(1), 93-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/riss2025oa19679

Mazzeo, F., Monda, M., Messina, G., Santamaria, S., Messina, A., Montesano, M., & Tafuri, D. (2016). Doping in Italy: An analysis of its spread in ten years. Biology and Medicine, 8(1), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/0974-8369.1000263

Tafuri, M.G., Gravino, G., Scala, G., Di Palma, D., & Romano, G. (2026). Effects of an instructional handball programme on motor and social skills in a secondary school: A randomized study with qualitative-quantitative design. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 21(1), 82-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55860/y00gk130

Raiola, G., Tafuri, D., & Altavilla, G. (2015). Physical activity and its relation to body and ludic expression in childhood. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 293-296.

Carron, A.V., & Brawley, L.R. (2000). Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 31(1), 89-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100105

Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Lane, A.M., Beedie, C.J., Jones, M.V., Uphill, M., & Devonport, T.J. (2012). The BASES expert statement on emotion regulation in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30(11), 1189-1195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.693621

Weinberg, R.S., & Gould, D. (2019). Foundations of sport and exercise psychology (7th ed.). Human Kinetics.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Scala, G., Badii Esposito, F., & Tafuri, D. (2026). Emotional Synchronisation and Motor Coordination in Artistic Swimming: The Role of Team Cohesion in Synchronised Performance. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 26(3), 610–618. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2026.3.22

Issue

Section

Original Scientific Articles. Health-Related Physical Activity and Inclusion