TY - JOUR AU - Guo, Pengcheng AU - Zhang, Ziyang AU - Huang, Zijian AU - Kong, Xianglin AU - Diachenko, Andrii AU - Rusanova, Olga AU - Rusanov, Andrey PY - 2022/03/25 Y2 - 2024/03/29 TI - Features of the Canoeists’ Special Physical Fitness at the Distance of 1000 m JF - Physical Education Theory and Methodology JA - Teor. metod. fiz. vihov. VL - 22 IS - 1 SE - Original Scientific Articles DO - 10.17309/tmfv.2022.1.15 UR - https://tmfv.com.ua/journal/article/view/1607 SP - 106-112 AB - <p><strong>The aim of the study.</strong> To better understanding of the indicators of functional support for special endurance and physiological demands in canoeists at a distance of 1000 m.<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span></p><p><strong>Material and methods:</strong> 20 athletes (19-23 years) in canoeing from Shandong and Jiangxi provinces.<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span></p><p><strong>Results.</strong> According to the results of the analysis, the following typological groups of athletes-canoeists, specializing in the distance of 1000 m, with pronounced differences in the implementation of anaerobic energy supply. Typological groups of athletes had no significant differences in aerobic energy capacity (p &gt; 0.05).<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span></p><p>The first typological group (La max 90s &lt;10.08 mmol·l<sup>-1</sup>, p &lt; 0.05) is characterized by: power indicators 4.96&nbsp;±&nbsp;2.35&nbsp;mmol·l<sup>-1</sup> and anaerobic energy supply capacity 6.93 ± 3.16 mmol·l<sup>-1</sup>, which were the lowest among other groups of athletes. Athletes showed significantly low performance in 10-s, 30-s and 90-s tests, and performed less work in the step test, with varying degrees of severity of fatigue compensation mechanisms.<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span></p><p>The second typological group (La max 90s – 10.08-16.64 mmol·l<sup>-1</sup>, p &lt; 0.05), is characterized by high power 7.4&nbsp;±&nbsp;1.68&nbsp;mmol·l<sup>-1</sup> and low capacity anaerobic energy supply 13.32 ± 1.52 mmol·l<sup>-1</sup>. Athletes performed a sufficient amount of work in the step test (3-4 steps), but performance in the 90-s test was reduced, there were reduced characteristics of the ability to compensate for fatigue.</p><p>The third typological group (La max 90 c-&gt; 16.64 mmol·l<sup>-1</sup>, p &lt;0.05) is characterized by: power indicators 8.20&nbsp;±&nbsp;2.36&nbsp;mmol·l<sup>-1</sup><span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp; </span>and anaerobic energy supply capacity 17.85 ± 1.05 mmol·l<sup>-1</sup>, which were the highest among other groups of athletes and significantly (p &lt; 0.05) higher performance in 30-s, 90-s tests, and the level of power at which the maximum oxygen consumption in the step test is reached.<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span></p><p><strong>Conclusion.</strong> The results of the studies indicate differences in the level of functional support for special endurance for paddlers of uniform groups&nbsp;for canoeists that specialize in a distance of 1000 m.<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span></p> ER -