Algorithm for Assessment of Students’ Individual Choice of Sports Sections

Authors

  • Ж. О. Цимбалюк G.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University
  • Л. В. Коник G.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University
  • В. А. Тихонова G.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2016.2.1160

Keywords:

student, priorities of motivational choice, club, hierarchical model

Abstract

Research objective. To develop a model of students’ decision-making when individually choosing a sports section.

Research methods: The study relies on the analysis of scientific and methodological literature, questionnaires, and factor analysis. The participants in the study were 55 first-year students (2015 enrollment year) of the School of Ukrainian Language and Literature of H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University.

Research results. The analysis of the questionnaires showed diverse motivational choices. The factor analysis revealed the prevailing motifs. The study comes up with a hierarchical model of students’ choice of a training section by a particular sport, and determines the system of subjective values of each student in points.

Conclusions. The model developed by the hierarchy analysis allows to take into account all the variants of priorities in the students’ motivational choice. The method of hierarchy analysis allows to objectively process the subjective advantages seen by the students (who do not have any sports experience) when choosing a training section in the opted-for sport. This, in its turn, cultivates a steady motivation for physical education, allows to determine the required number of sports sections, and to distribute the educational and sports facilities at the higher educational university.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alekseychuk I., Dobrovol’s’ka N., Nachata O. (2002). Motyvy zanyat’ fizychnoyu kul’turoyu i sportom u vyshchiy shkoli. Fizychne vykhovannya, sport i kul’tura zdorovya u suchasnomu suspil’stvi: zb. nauk. prats’. T.1. Luts’k, 173-175.

Barybina L. N., Kolomiets N. And., Komika V. A. (2014). Application of the algorithm of individualization of process of physical education studentsю. Physical education students (6), 3-7.

Hruzhevs’kyy V.O. (2008). Porivnyal’nyy analiz dynamiky viddannya perevahy zanyattyam konkretnymy sportu studentiv VNZ. Pedahohika, psykholohiya ta medykobiolohichni problemy fizychnoho vykhovannya i sportu,(3),58-61.

Yesionova H.O. (2006). Doslidzhennya motyviv studentiv do zanyat’ fizychnymy vpravamy. Pedahohika, psykholohiya ta medyko-biolohichni problemy fizychnoho vykhovannya i sportu: naukova monohrafiya za red. prof. Yermakova S. S., Kharkiv: KhDADM (KhKhPI), (10), 96-99.

Krutsevych T.Yu., Podlesnyy O.I. (2008). Potrebovo-motyvatsiynyy pidkhid do upravlinnya fizychnym vykhovannyam studentiv. Teoriya i metodyka fizychnoho vykhovannya, (2), 69–74.

Lutsenko L.S., Bodrenkova S.A. (2014). Physical education University students on the basis of the choice of sports specialization. Journal of CNPU them. T. G. Shevchenko (118 (3)), 177-181.

Melykydze K.Sh., Stepanyan A.A. (2001). Fyzkul’tura y sport kak эkzystentsyalы v konspektelychnosty samorealyzatsyy: materyalы konferentsyy. Fyzycheskoe vospytanye y sovremennыe problemы formyrovanyya y sokhranenyya zdorov’ya molodezhы, Hrodno, Belarus’, 100-101.

Piddubnyy O.H., Tsymbalyuk Zh.O., Hohina T.I., Konovalov V.V. (2012). Orhanyzatsiyno-metodychni osnovy pobudovy fizychnoho vykhovannya studentiv pedahohichnykh vyshchykh navchal’nykh zakladiv: navch. posibnyk dlya orhanyzatoriv zanyat’ z fiz. Vykhovannya, Kh.: KhNPU, 201.

Stasiuk G.M., Wastika F.I., Osipova I.L. (2009). Problems and ways of increase of efficiency of physical education in higher education. Pedagogics, psychology, medicalbiological problems of physical training and sports(3), 146-149.

Published

2016-08-06

How to Cite

Цимбалюк, Ж. О., Коник, Л. В., & Тихонова, В. А. (2016). Algorithm for Assessment of Students’ Individual Choice of Sports Sections. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, (2), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2016.2.1160

Issue

Section

Physical Training Education

Most read articles by the same author(s)